Two avoidable deaths associated with Cambridge University

Naive wishful thinking is responsible.

TWO ENTIRELY AVOIDABLE DEATHS

The murder of two University of Cambridge graduates by a jihadi was entirely avoidable, if there had been even a modicum of understanding of Islam. With such an understanding the alarm bells would have rung when the perpetrator had stated that he wanted to be a “good Muslim”. If such an alert had been raised, he would certainly not have been let out of prison to go on his murderous rampage.

Two lives were needlessly lost, as a direct consequence of naive wishful thinking ignorance.

For someone with a naive understanding of Islam, that phrase “good Muslim” probably brought to mind someone who prays and fasts and maybe would go on pilgrimage to Mecca. They would not envisage a Muslim strapping a fake suicide belt to themselves, and taping two knives to their wrists and then going on a stabbing spree - murdering two and injuring several more.

The University of Cambridge is to blame, as it is too for the tragic suicide of Jason Arday. They are out of control, and must urgently be audited, before the body count increases further.

JIHAD ATTACK AT FISHMONGERS’ HALL

The details are here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_London_Bridge_stabbings

Quote from the Wikipedia article:

On 29 November 2019, five people were stabbed, two of them fatally, in Central London. The attacker, Usman Khan, was fatally shot by City of London Police.

Since Khan was considered a "success story" for a Cambridge University rehabilitation programme,^[1][2] and was featured as a case study by the University,^[3] he was attending an offender rehabilitation conference in Fishmongers' Hall. He threatened to detonate what turned out to be a fake suicide vest and started attacking people with two knives taped to his wrists, killing two of the conference participants by stabbing them in the chest. Several people fought back, some attacking Khan with a fire extinguisher, a pike and a narwhal tusk as he fled the building and emerged on to London Bridge, where he was partially disarmed by a plain-clothes police officer. He was restrained by members of the public until additional police officers arrived, pulled away those restraining him, and shot him. Khan died at the scene.

Background

A conference on offender rehabilitation was held on 29 November 2019 in Fishmongers’ Hall, at the northern end of London Bridge, in the City of London, to celebrate the fifth anniversary of Learning Together, a programme run by the Cambridge Institute of Criminology to help offenders reintegrate into society following their release from prison.^[4] Learning Together was set up in 2014 by University of Cambridge academics Ruth Armstrong and Amy Ludlow from the Faculty of Law and Institute of Criminology^[5] to “bring together people in criminal justice and higher education institutions to study alongside each other in inclusive and transformative learning communities”^[6] to enable students and prisoners to work together.^[5]

Former prisoner Usman Khan had been invited to the conference as a previous participant in the programme,^[7] and although banned from entering London under the terms of his release, he was granted a one-day exemption to attend.^[8][9]

^{/ end of Wikipedia quote}

^{Read the details of the attack via the link above.}

FIRE EXTINGUISHER AS AN EFFECTIVE WEAPON AGAINST JIHADIS

When confronted with an attacker with a knife, you need some object to keep them out of range. Whatever that object may be - a chair for example, or your coat held at arms length.

Several brave people tackled Usman Khan. One with a Narwal tusk that was on display in Fishmongers’ Hall. Another with a fire extinguisher.

It was an incredibly brave thing to do - he had two knives and what appeared to be a belt of explosives. It turned out to be fake, but they did not know that at the time.

It turns out that a fire extinguisher is a good choice. In this particular case the person using it was directing the spray at the explosive belt. In those circumstances I would have directed the spray at the eyes of the perpetrator. Temporarily blinding him. Then I would go behind him, out of the way of the knives, and used the fire extinguisher as a club, striking down on his head and hopefully rendering him unconscious.

Whenever I attend a public meeting I look around for the fire extinguisher, and position myself near it. You never know if a jihadi might burst in.

BBC article:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-northamptonshire-65018967

It is a tragedy that these two young adults were murdered. But entirely avoidable, if only Cambridge University had a modicum of understanding of Islam. I wrote to the university shortly after the attack, my letter is copied below. Needless to say, I received no replies.

Below is a short chapter “Duty of Care” from my book “Hellish 2050”. My letter below is also in that book. That is the book that got me fired from the University of Bath at the end of November 2019. My firing was nearly exactly coincident with the attack. I added the chapter below and letter to a later edition of the book. A paperback copy of this later edition of the book, together with the letter, was sent to the three professors at Cambridge University most closely associated with these events. Of course, none of them replied.

That is not the only strange coincidence of dates. I subsequently wrote a book “Concise Islam” and posted the paperback copy to nearly all MPs. Excluding Sinn Fein MPs and Muslim MPs. Everyone else was sent a copy. Sent in batches of around 50 copies, spread over a couple of weeks. By very strange coincidence the final batch was posted on the very morning that Sir David Amess was murdered by a jihadi. 15th October 2021. I sent the books to Conservatives first, and as his surname starts with an A he was in the first batch. It is highly likely that he received it before he was murdered. I so wish that he had read it and taken adequate security precautions. Non-Muslims need to realise that Islam hates us even if we help Muslims. Sir David Amess had helped Muslims in his constituency, but that did not shield him from the anger of a jihadi. The Koran commands Muslims to hate us.

CHAPTER: DUTY OF CARE

“15th Monday October 2012

Mr. USMAN KHAN, HMP Belmarsh

Dear [redacted],

As you are fully aware of my offence, which is a Terrorism offence. It relates more to what I intended and the mindset at that time, also the views I carried. Which I realise now after spending some time to think were not according to Islam and its teachings.

I would be greatful if you could arrange some kind of course, that I can also do where I can properly learn Islam and its teachings, and I can prove I don’t carry the extreme views which I might have carried before. I have been inform [sic] there are courses like this, like the Deradicalisation Course which is approved by the home office. I would like to do such a course, so I can prove to the authorities, my family and society in general that I don’t carry the views I had before my arrest and also I can prove that at the time I was immature, and now I am much more mature and want to live my life as a good Muslim and also a good citizen of Britain.

So if you could arrange something for me and send me the details, this would be truly appreciated.”

This is the letter written by convicted Jihadi terrorist Usman Khan, who in 2012 received an indeterminate sentence for numerous terrorism offences. At the Court of Appeal in 2013, Lord Justice Leveson reduced his sentence to 16 years with an automatic release after 8 years.

In prison he completed the “Healthy Identity Intervention Programme”. After release he did the “Desistance and Disengagement Programme”, intended to address the root causes of terrorism.

He was considered a success story for the “Learning Together” programme run by the University of Cambridge. At their conference on 29th November 2019, at Fishmongers’ Hall, London, Usman Khan stabbed five people, two fatally.

He was wearing a fake suicide belt. The two who were killed had befriended and helped him. Khan was later shot dead by police.

What lessons are to be learned?

• Never trust anything that a Jihadi terrorist says. Muslims are permitted to tell lies, look up: “taqiyya”, “kitman”, “tawriya”, and “muruna”.

• In his letter, Khan stated that he wanted to be a “good Muslim”. This should have rung alarm bells. A good Muslim is one who follows Islamic scripture, particularly the Koran, and the example of the life of Mohammed. The Koran has numerous instructions for Muslims to kill non-Muslims. Mohammed did this himself and ordered his followers to do so too.

• It is not permitted for a Muslim to be a friend of a non-Muslim. See Koran 9:23, 5:51, 5:80, 58:14, 22:4, 4:89, 4:139, 4:144, 60:1, 60:9, 60:13. For the staff at the University of Cambridge to believe that they had befriended Khan shows a gross naïvety and lack of understanding of Islam.

• The “Desistance and Disengagement Programme” needs to be clear that the root cause of Jihadi terrorism is the Koran and the example of the life of Mohammed.

Two young lives were tragically lost and others were injured physically and mentally - as a result of the naïve idea that Muslims do not in fact believe in the violent verses within the Koran. The University of Cambridge utterly failed in its duty of care to those attending its conference. Not surprising, when you consider the Government has failed in its duty of care for the whole UK. It permits Islam to thrive.

The Guardian newspaper article “Lie-detector tests planned for convicted terrorists freed on licence” was published on 21 Jan 2020. It states: “Convicted terrorists will face lie-detector tests under a raft of measures drawn up in the wake of the most recent London Bridge attack to toughen up the monitoring of offenders in the community.”

“The number of counter-terrorism specialist probation officers will double and they will work to a set of updated national standards for managing terrorists on licence, with closer monitoring and reporting requirements including polygraph tests, the Home Office and Ministry of Justice said in a joint announcement.” …

“The review will be led by Jonathan Hall QC, the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation.” …

“A counter-terrorism bill to be unveiled within the first 100 days of the new government will end automatic release on licence for terrorist offenders who receive extended determinate sentences and will introduce a mandatory minimum of 14 years in prison for those convicted of preparing acts of terrorism or directing a terrorist organisation.” …

“The government will also increase the number of specialist psychologists and specially trained imams in prisons and probation who assess the risk of radicalised offenders.”

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jan/21/lie-detector-testsplanned-for-convicted-terrorists-freed-on-licence

There is a fundamental problem with using lie detectors on Muslims: Islam permits them to tell lies! There is no moral injunction within Islam for them to tell the truth. Indeed their scripture quotes Mohammed commanding them to deceive.

Look up: “taqiyya”, “kitman”, “tawriya”, and “muruna”. It is unlikely that there would be a physiological reaction, such as sweating, when a Muslim lies for Allah, hence the lie detector test would be useless. The “specially trained imams” are also permitted to lie. The only way to safeguard the public is to impose life sentences for Jihadi terrorists.

The de-radicalisation programme in Austria is also failing:

“Vienna terrorist likely acted alone, ‘fooled’ de-radicalization program” https://www.timesofisrael.com/vienna-terrorist-likely-actedalone-fooled-de-radicalization-program/

LETTER TO THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE

To: Ruth Armstrong, Amy Ludlow, and Stephen Toope

Dear Professor,

Regarding the tragic events at Fishmongers’ Hall: My sympathies and condolences are with those who were attacked, and with those who witnessed it. And I wish a good recovery for those with physical and mental injuries.

I have some suggested recommendations, see the “Duty of Care” section in the enclosed book.

From an outside perspective there does seem to have been a lack of understanding of Islam itself. This appears to be at the root of the errors made. Specifically, Usman Khan wrote in his letter that he wanted to be a “good Muslim”. This statement should have rung alarm bells. A good Muslim will wish to follow accurately the Islamic scriptures, and the example of the life of Mohamed. Mohamed killed numerous people himself, including prisoners of war in cold blood. The Koran contains numerous verses which command the killing of non-Muslims. Importantly these verses have not been abrogated, and so remain as relevant today as when written some 14 centuries ago.

The “Abrogated Koran” has abrogated verses crossed out. Key verses are colour coded by category. It is a free download from http://hellish2050.com/

If you were to speak honestly about Islam this could have a negative effect on your career. I have de facto been sacked from the University of Bath because of the enclosed book and this website. I have examined Islam in my own time, and it has nothing to do with my research at the University in Electronics and Physics. See the “Personal Cost” section.

Regarding the proposed use of lie detectors on terrorists – it is unlikely to help as Islam permits lying.

If you have any comments or questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I would like to assist if possible.

BECOME A PAID SUBSCRIBER

I was fired from my job at a UK university for writing a book criticising Islam. Written in my own time and published at my own expense.

Be sure to subscribe to my Substack!

Paid subscribers receive the PDF of the Abrogated Koran ebook for free, and the PDFs of 4 additional ebooks. Having the PDF allows you to very easily do text searches for key words. I don’t think you will get anything like this anywhere else on the internet. Put a comment if you can prove me wrong.

It is emotionally draining to read the Koran, as it is utterly evil. However we have to understand thoroughly what exactly we are opposing, if we are to be effective in opposing it. We cannot avoid this serious task.

After becoming a paid subscriber, go to this article: “Paid subscribers receive…” via this link below. The second part of this article is unlocked for paid subscribers, and there are five “Download” buttons for the free ebooks:

Paid subscribers receive FIVE free PDFs! “Project Phoenix UK”, “Concise Islam”, “Abrogated Koran”, “Why I Left Islam” and “Allah is a Zionist”.

SUPER PAID SUBSCRIBERS

If you are able to become a Super Subscriber (Founder), then as a thank you, you can download ALL of the ebooks at no additional cost.

After subscribing, the second part of this article below is unlocked for you, and it has all the “download” buttons:

Super Subscribers (Founders) receive ALL 41 ebooks FREE!

BOOK DETAILS

The descriptions of all the books, and the links to order them are here:

BOOK CATALOGUE

If you are being put off becoming a subscriber because of the barrage of emails - don’t. You can switch off receiving emails via the Substack settings. Search online for instructions how to do it. Or set up a separate email account to keep your main email account clear.

You can also support my work via “buy me a coffee”. Note the page can take up to 20 seconds to load, be patient! Click on this link:

https://buymeacoffee.com/hellish2050

Thank you for your generous support. It is very much appreciated.

If you are not able to support financially at this time, you can very much help this Substack by posting links to my articles when you write comments below articles on other Substacks. That helps to widen the audience. Of course, post articles that are relevant to the topic. Thank you.

Please share and re-stack