It highlights the differences between Reform and Restore. You can quite clearly see that Reform is controlled opposition, that if they get in to government they will continue the globalist agenda. At the same time you can see that Restore is genuinely anti establishment, anti the agenda of the globalist World Economic Forum.
I scored 15 points for Restore.
I rest my case.
Hopefully it might make a few Reform supporters switch but, it has to be remembered that the majority of Restore supporters are traditionally non voters, the ignored, the forgotten, and the awakened, there is no switching between parties for them, just a switching on... to Rupert Lowe and Restore Britain 🇬🇧
A very good point that Restore Britain has the ability to get people to vote who had otherwise given up voting.
The same thing happened in the EU referendum vote. I sat outside a polling station collecting voting card numbers. And it was very obvious that many people were completely unfamiliar with the voting procedure.
The pollsters got that wrong, and I think they are very probably getting this by election wrong too. And for that same reason.
The entire UK needs ta be free of the I-Slam-ist/ick cloud over it. Restore (by bannin' kosher slaughter) will also take out a percentage of the already-few joos in England (that's all Orthodox--not just ultras--few'll care, I know) an' even the non-Orthodox, already under attack, are leavin' in droves. So (fergettin' that this ain't good fer joos who are fews....) I'll speak fer others--such as those of dual citizenship (non-Israeli) an' those who are of mixed heritage or mixed faith an' tho' keen on riddin' the naytion of I-slam (an' of the Nation of I-Slam too!) but not so keen on the rest....
Keepin' the his'try & the literature & ALL that's English is a good thang.... but is it wurth the risk of becomin' the other end of the same horseshoe?.... No answers here, jus' concerns as a seemin'ly reasonable pamphlet is not the entire omelet!
I have a high regard for Melanie Phillips. I read her "Londonistan" book two decades ago, when I was starting to try to understand all of this mess.
I had a read of the article you linked to. It references her Times article that I have not read as it is behind a paywall. It sounds as though she got into an online spat with a few people who were trying to wind her up. And clearly succeeded.
In reality there is no political party that is perfect.
The way I see it, and correct me if I am wrong: Islam is the biggest threat to Jews in the UK. The hatred of Jews is hard-baked into Islamic scripture. See my recent email to MPs for the evidence. Any party that tolerates Islam is therefore a threat to Jews.
This includes the Green Party and Labour primarily. They rely on the Muslim vote and so of course they are pro-Islam.
It also includes the Lib Dems (who think Islam is liberal!).
It includes the Conservatives, whose top politicians have blatantly lied to shield Islam from criticism. David Cameron and Boris Johnson denied the link between the murder of Lee Rigby and Islamic teaching. I demolished that lie in my recent email.
Does it also include Reform UK? This is the big question.
Farage is on record stating it is immoral to oppose Islam. He has stated that if we do so we will lose.
If we take his advice and NOT oppose Islam then we will certainly lose.
And Jews in particular will bear the brunt of an Islam controlled UK.
I have not read every one of the articles by Melanie recently. Does she anywhere suggest which political party we should vote for?
I actually agree with a lot of the proposals on both sides but with certain caveats.
According to Melanie Phillips, Restore would apparently disallow dual nationals — that is, "people holding British citizenship along with another one". I read somewhere else (Connor Tomlinson I think) that Restore also advocates citizens must have British parents on both sides, presumably to be considered "pure enough". That would exclude at least half the media, show business and practically all the English football teams. What a fun place this new Britain would be. Thank goodness I already left as my credentials would not measure up.
Such a very narrow definition of who would be eligible to live in Rupert's Britain brings back memories of that Aryan doctrine that so many Brits died fighting some 8 decades ago.
On the tick box part of the leaflet it only states deporting foreign nationals. It does not discuss dual nationals.
As far as I am aware Connor Tomlinson is not in charge of party policy. He speaks very eloquently, but it is not always clear if he is expressing his own views, or stating party policy.
It is a new party. There are plenty who would like it to fail, for various reasons.
As with any party, there are various hangers on who push their own particular agenda.
He has arrived in Dublin, and it is then a relatively short distance.
If he were to arrive by helicopter that would almost certainly lose the contest for Burnham!
I recall Gordon Brown travelling by helicopter in the 2010 election. It did not do him much good. And the Gillian Duffy "bigoted woman" slur was the final straw.
It highlights the differences between Reform and Restore. You can quite clearly see that Reform is controlled opposition, that if they get in to government they will continue the globalist agenda. At the same time you can see that Restore is genuinely anti establishment, anti the agenda of the globalist World Economic Forum.
I scored 15 points for Restore.
I rest my case.
Hopefully it might make a few Reform supporters switch but, it has to be remembered that the majority of Restore supporters are traditionally non voters, the ignored, the forgotten, and the awakened, there is no switching between parties for them, just a switching on... to Rupert Lowe and Restore Britain 🇬🇧
A very good point that Restore Britain has the ability to get people to vote who had otherwise given up voting.
The same thing happened in the EU referendum vote. I sat outside a polling station collecting voting card numbers. And it was very obvious that many people were completely unfamiliar with the voting procedure.
The pollsters got that wrong, and I think they are very probably getting this by election wrong too. And for that same reason.
By "the postal vote", do you mean mail-in ballots? We find mail-in ballots to be extremely prone to fraud.
Yes, the same as mail-in ballots.
Particularly prone to fraud in the Islamic community.
It can be quite blatant, with many people registered at particular addresses for example, far more than could physically live there.
Birmingham Dispatch: Shabana Mahmood’s postal ballot was investigated in a 2004 vote-rigging scandal in Birmingham
https://hellish2050.substack.com/p/birmingham-dispatch-shabana-mahmoods
Sigh....methinks Melanie Phillips has the most clear-headed take on Restore.... I WISH 'twere so simple an' they were on the up & up.
https://melaniephillips.substack.com/p/the-true-face-of-restore?
The entire UK needs ta be free of the I-Slam-ist/ick cloud over it. Restore (by bannin' kosher slaughter) will also take out a percentage of the already-few joos in England (that's all Orthodox--not just ultras--few'll care, I know) an' even the non-Orthodox, already under attack, are leavin' in droves. So (fergettin' that this ain't good fer joos who are fews....) I'll speak fer others--such as those of dual citizenship (non-Israeli) an' those who are of mixed heritage or mixed faith an' tho' keen on riddin' the naytion of I-slam (an' of the Nation of I-Slam too!) but not so keen on the rest....
Keepin' the his'try & the literature & ALL that's English is a good thang.... but is it wurth the risk of becomin' the other end of the same horseshoe?.... No answers here, jus' concerns as a seemin'ly reasonable pamphlet is not the entire omelet!
Thank you Daisy, good comment.
I have a high regard for Melanie Phillips. I read her "Londonistan" book two decades ago, when I was starting to try to understand all of this mess.
I had a read of the article you linked to. It references her Times article that I have not read as it is behind a paywall. It sounds as though she got into an online spat with a few people who were trying to wind her up. And clearly succeeded.
In reality there is no political party that is perfect.
The way I see it, and correct me if I am wrong: Islam is the biggest threat to Jews in the UK. The hatred of Jews is hard-baked into Islamic scripture. See my recent email to MPs for the evidence. Any party that tolerates Islam is therefore a threat to Jews.
This includes the Green Party and Labour primarily. They rely on the Muslim vote and so of course they are pro-Islam.
It also includes the Lib Dems (who think Islam is liberal!).
It includes the Conservatives, whose top politicians have blatantly lied to shield Islam from criticism. David Cameron and Boris Johnson denied the link between the murder of Lee Rigby and Islamic teaching. I demolished that lie in my recent email.
Does it also include Reform UK? This is the big question.
Farage is on record stating it is immoral to oppose Islam. He has stated that if we do so we will lose.
If we take his advice and NOT oppose Islam then we will certainly lose.
And Jews in particular will bear the brunt of an Islam controlled UK.
I have not read every one of the articles by Melanie recently. Does she anywhere suggest which political party we should vote for?
I actually agree with a lot of the proposals on both sides but with certain caveats.
According to Melanie Phillips, Restore would apparently disallow dual nationals — that is, "people holding British citizenship along with another one". I read somewhere else (Connor Tomlinson I think) that Restore also advocates citizens must have British parents on both sides, presumably to be considered "pure enough". That would exclude at least half the media, show business and practically all the English football teams. What a fun place this new Britain would be. Thank goodness I already left as my credentials would not measure up.
Such a very narrow definition of who would be eligible to live in Rupert's Britain brings back memories of that Aryan doctrine that so many Brits died fighting some 8 decades ago.
On the tick box part of the leaflet it only states deporting foreign nationals. It does not discuss dual nationals.
As far as I am aware Connor Tomlinson is not in charge of party policy. He speaks very eloquently, but it is not always clear if he is expressing his own views, or stating party policy.
It is a new party. There are plenty who would like it to fail, for various reasons.
As with any party, there are various hangers on who push their own particular agenda.
carney the pm of Canada will be there tomorrow.
Have you read that somewhere?
He has arrived in Dublin, and it is then a relatively short distance.
If he were to arrive by helicopter that would almost certainly lose the contest for Burnham!
I recall Gordon Brown travelling by helicopter in the 2010 election. It did not do him much good. And the Gillian Duffy "bigoted woman" slur was the final straw.
It was in his itinerary.