I agree with you ... 100% The people I feel really sorry for are the Irish. Southern Ireland has a population of about 5 million (that's half that of London). Just a few years ago the demographics were intact. Ireland was 95% to 98% indigenous Irish. No more. The Government (c/o Mr Soros, and others) have reduced the native population to about 80%.
It breaks my heart to hear how accurately you have described the downfall of your once beautiful country. We lived in the Chelsea area of London in 1972-73. It was English and we had a most enjoyable stay. My husband was working at Imperial College.
Thanks for your feedback. I'm a Londoner. I can trace my family history, back multiple generations. My grandfather (my mother's father) fought in World War One, from 1914 to 1918.He was shot, gassed, taken prisoner ... and mistakenly reported as K.I.A. (Killed In Action). I was lucky enough to have known him. What the hell did he fight for?
The current generation need to do what we can to fight back and not surrender.
The same thing -- demographic replacement -- has happened in major Canadian cities as well. One in four Canadians is an immigrant or the children of immigrants -- mostly from India, China, Sri Lanka, the Philippines, Pakistan, Syria, etc.
The big difference with the UK is that no one talks about it in Canada. There is no resistance to it. Caucasians are indigenous to the UK and have a long history and national pride; Canadians are not. And they are quite passive. So they are quietly accepting their own replacement.
Talking about it is taboo, even though the ancestors of "old stock Canadians" built the country up out of the wilderness for their descendants and would never have imagined that national leaders would just hand it over so easily to people with entirely different value systems and cultural origins after all the hard work was done. Now Islamists are in Canada, for example.
"Based on 2021 Census data from Statistics Canada, several Canadian cities (municipalities) and major urban centres have reached 'majority-minority' status, meaning residents identifying as white (Caucasian) make up less than 50% of the population. This demographic shift is most prominent in Metro Vancouver and the Greater Toronto Area (GTA).
[NB - that was in 2021 - and every year about half a million more immigrants come in and more older white people die; immigrants have more children as well]
Municipalities with Minority-White Populations
In these cities, more than 50% of residents identify as a visible minority:
Richmond, BC: 80.3% visible minority
Brampton, ON: 80.6% visible minority
Burnaby, BC: 67.8% visible minority
Surrey, BC: 67.1% visible minority
Coquitlam, BC: 56.5% visible minority
Vancouver, BC (City): 54.5% visible minority
Markham, ON: ~73% visible minority
NB - why do they call them a "minority" if they're the majority?!
Within the Metro Vancouver region, the visible minority population has become the majority in several areas:
Richmond (80%)
Burnaby (67.8%)
Surrey (67.1%)
Coquitlam (56.5%)
Vancouver (54.5%)
Toronto/GTA Region
Several municipalities in the GTA are now majority-minority:
Brampton (80.6%)
Markham
Mississauga
Toronto (City): 57.0% visible minority in the metropolitan area
Other Areas
Calgary, AB: While the city as a whole has a high white population, some specific neighbourhoods and the overall diversity rate are rising quickly.
Note: Statistics Canada defines "visible minority" as "persons, other than Aboriginal peoples, who are non-Caucasian in race or non-white in colour".
There’s a strong argument that globalists (and I include the UN under that term) have a double standard when it comes to population replacement:
(1) Various UN charters and covenants protect the rights of indigenous peoples. They protect the right to self-determination, the right to not be demographically overwhelmed, the right to protect the demographic and social fabric of a people, and the right to protect the “integrity” of a people.
(2) The British people are the indigenous population of the British Isles. Population genetics indicate that between 1066 and 1945, there was 90–95% genetic continuity. The largest demographic events during that time period would have been the Norman Conquest. While Norman Conquest transformed England’s ruling class, language, and institutions, it had minimal demographic impact. This is because (a) the Norman settlers were few in number and (b) it was a highly stratified society, so the Normans tended to marry amongst themselves, and not with the broader English population. It is generally believed that the Norman Conquest injected between 5% and 10% of new genetic material into the English population.
(3) Under the UN Charter and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), "all peoples have the right of self-determination." This implies that a people should have the power to "freely determine their political status." In practice, if a group is demographically overwhelmed to the point where they can no longer exercise political control over their institutions or destiny, their right to self-determination is effectively nullified.
(4) The Rome Statute (Article 7): Lists "deportation or forcible transfer of population" as a crime against humanity. While this usually refers to moving people out, the legal intent is to protect the demographic and social fabric of a community in its home.
(5) The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) provides the most explicit language regarding the "integrity" of a people. Article 8: States that indigenous peoples have the right not to be subjected to "forced assimilation or destruction of their culture." It requires states to provide redress for any action which has the "aim or effect of depriving them of their integrity as distinct peoples." This acknowledges that maintaining a "distinct identity" is impossible without certain protections for the group's presence and influence in their ancestral lands.
(6) These protections are routinely applied to indigenous populations in the New World but never to indigenous populations in the Old World. For example, the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM), adopted by the UN in 2018, aims to make migration easier, safer, and more structured — which has the effect of increasing migration, especially toward developed economies. This migration, which is supported by globalists, is leading to white British being demographically (and therefore politically) overwhelmed in their ancestral homeland.
The same trend has been going on in most Democratic States including the US, Canada, Australia and NZ.
I agree with you ... 100% The people I feel really sorry for are the Irish. Southern Ireland has a population of about 5 million (that's half that of London). Just a few years ago the demographics were intact. Ireland was 95% to 98% indigenous Irish. No more. The Government (c/o Mr Soros, and others) have reduced the native population to about 80%.
It breaks my heart to hear how accurately you have described the downfall of your once beautiful country. We lived in the Chelsea area of London in 1972-73. It was English and we had a most enjoyable stay. My husband was working at Imperial College.
Thanks for your feedback. I'm a Londoner. I can trace my family history, back multiple generations. My grandfather (my mother's father) fought in World War One, from 1914 to 1918.He was shot, gassed, taken prisoner ... and mistakenly reported as K.I.A. (Killed In Action). I was lucky enough to have known him. What the hell did he fight for?
The current generation need to do what we can to fight back and not surrender.
Yes we must fight back to preserve our way of life.
That’s a good point
All of us that are aware of what's going on, need to collaborate and cooperate ....
to avoid a nightmarish future. As individuals, we may only be able to achieve
"small victories" .... but "small victories" are important.
That is true
"Stranger in a Strange Land" is a Sci-Fi novel written by Robert Heinlein.
But "Stranger in a Strange Land" is exactly what you will feel like if you take a stroll
down Whitechapel High Street.
The same thing -- demographic replacement -- has happened in major Canadian cities as well. One in four Canadians is an immigrant or the children of immigrants -- mostly from India, China, Sri Lanka, the Philippines, Pakistan, Syria, etc.
The big difference with the UK is that no one talks about it in Canada. There is no resistance to it. Caucasians are indigenous to the UK and have a long history and national pride; Canadians are not. And they are quite passive. So they are quietly accepting their own replacement.
Talking about it is taboo, even though the ancestors of "old stock Canadians" built the country up out of the wilderness for their descendants and would never have imagined that national leaders would just hand it over so easily to people with entirely different value systems and cultural origins after all the hard work was done. Now Islamists are in Canada, for example.
"Based on 2021 Census data from Statistics Canada, several Canadian cities (municipalities) and major urban centres have reached 'majority-minority' status, meaning residents identifying as white (Caucasian) make up less than 50% of the population. This demographic shift is most prominent in Metro Vancouver and the Greater Toronto Area (GTA).
[NB - that was in 2021 - and every year about half a million more immigrants come in and more older white people die; immigrants have more children as well]
Municipalities with Minority-White Populations
In these cities, more than 50% of residents identify as a visible minority:
Richmond, BC: 80.3% visible minority
Brampton, ON: 80.6% visible minority
Burnaby, BC: 67.8% visible minority
Surrey, BC: 67.1% visible minority
Coquitlam, BC: 56.5% visible minority
Vancouver, BC (City): 54.5% visible minority
Markham, ON: ~73% visible minority
NB - why do they call them a "minority" if they're the majority?!
Within the Metro Vancouver region, the visible minority population has become the majority in several areas:
Richmond (80%)
Burnaby (67.8%)
Surrey (67.1%)
Coquitlam (56.5%)
Vancouver (54.5%)
Toronto/GTA Region
Several municipalities in the GTA are now majority-minority:
Brampton (80.6%)
Markham
Mississauga
Toronto (City): 57.0% visible minority in the metropolitan area
Other Areas
Calgary, AB: While the city as a whole has a high white population, some specific neighbourhoods and the overall diversity rate are rising quickly.
Note: Statistics Canada defines "visible minority" as "persons, other than Aboriginal peoples, who are non-Caucasian in race or non-white in colour".
There’s a strong argument that globalists (and I include the UN under that term) have a double standard when it comes to population replacement:
(1) Various UN charters and covenants protect the rights of indigenous peoples. They protect the right to self-determination, the right to not be demographically overwhelmed, the right to protect the demographic and social fabric of a people, and the right to protect the “integrity” of a people.
(2) The British people are the indigenous population of the British Isles. Population genetics indicate that between 1066 and 1945, there was 90–95% genetic continuity. The largest demographic events during that time period would have been the Norman Conquest. While Norman Conquest transformed England’s ruling class, language, and institutions, it had minimal demographic impact. This is because (a) the Norman settlers were few in number and (b) it was a highly stratified society, so the Normans tended to marry amongst themselves, and not with the broader English population. It is generally believed that the Norman Conquest injected between 5% and 10% of new genetic material into the English population.
(3) Under the UN Charter and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), "all peoples have the right of self-determination." This implies that a people should have the power to "freely determine their political status." In practice, if a group is demographically overwhelmed to the point where they can no longer exercise political control over their institutions or destiny, their right to self-determination is effectively nullified.
(4) The Rome Statute (Article 7): Lists "deportation or forcible transfer of population" as a crime against humanity. While this usually refers to moving people out, the legal intent is to protect the demographic and social fabric of a community in its home.
(5) The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) provides the most explicit language regarding the "integrity" of a people. Article 8: States that indigenous peoples have the right not to be subjected to "forced assimilation or destruction of their culture." It requires states to provide redress for any action which has the "aim or effect of depriving them of their integrity as distinct peoples." This acknowledges that maintaining a "distinct identity" is impossible without certain protections for the group's presence and influence in their ancestral lands.
(6) These protections are routinely applied to indigenous populations in the New World but never to indigenous populations in the Old World. For example, the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM), adopted by the UN in 2018, aims to make migration easier, safer, and more structured — which has the effect of increasing migration, especially toward developed economies. This migration, which is supported by globalists, is leading to white British being demographically (and therefore politically) overwhelmed in their ancestral homeland.
many thanks for the extended feedback. We who know what's going on have a duty to wake up as many people as possible, especially upcoming generation.